The Goal of Human Ideation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Simplified text and corrected a mistake about the discourse) |
m (Reference) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Snyopsis == | == Snyopsis == | ||
{{Quote box|width=360px|bgcolor=|align=left|quoted=1|salign=right|quote=So idolatry, which is so prevalent in India, is meaningless, has got no value in the realm of spirituality.|source=Shrii Shrii Anandamurti}} | {{Quote box|width=360px|bgcolor=|align=left|quoted=1|salign=right|quote=So idolatry, which is so prevalent in India, is meaningless, has got no value in the realm of spirituality.|source=Shrii Shrii Anandamurti}} | ||
Anandamurti starts the discourse by asking an [[avadhuta]] whether tempus eternal and nature combined can be the goal of human life. He then goes on asking different questions aimed at determining what may be considered the final desideratum of human life. Anandamurti asserts that the only appropriate goal of human beings is the non-transcendental entity, [[Parama Purusa]]. | Anandamurti starts the discourse by asking an [[avadhuta]] whether tempus eternal and nature combined can be the goal of human life. He then goes on asking different questions aimed at determining what may be considered the final desideratum of human life. Anandamurti asserts that the only appropriate goal of human beings is the non-transcendental entity, [[Parama Purusa]].<ref name="AV12" /> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||