Talk:Pita mata bandhu sakha: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Talk header) |
(→Life's splendor: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
== Life's splendor == | |||
"You exist, therefore I also exist"... this simple but elegant ontological assertion logically surpasses Rene Descartes' "Je pense, donc je suis" (I think, therefore I am). The philosophical syllogism expressed in this song is encapsulated in its three verses. (1) By definition, God is everywhere and everything, ever uplifting. (2) Such a paragon exists. (3) Therefore, I exist, and God alone is my splendor. With such a conclusion, this contemplative song takes us well beyond the periphery of ordinary philosophy and even ordinary rationality. It takes us to the ultimate blissful auxiliary, the neohumanistic realm of supra-aesthetic/devotional science (mohan vijiṋána). --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 08:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:48, 9 August 2016
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pita mata bandhu sakha article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Life's splendor
"You exist, therefore I also exist"... this simple but elegant ontological assertion logically surpasses Rene Descartes' "Je pense, donc je suis" (I think, therefore I am). The philosophical syllogism expressed in this song is encapsulated in its three verses. (1) By definition, God is everywhere and everything, ever uplifting. (2) Such a paragon exists. (3) Therefore, I exist, and God alone is my splendor. With such a conclusion, this contemplative song takes us well beyond the periphery of ordinary philosophy and even ordinary rationality. It takes us to the ultimate blissful auxiliary, the neohumanistic realm of supra-aesthetic/devotional science (mohan vijiṋána). --Abhidevananda (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)