Progressive Utilization Theory: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Fixed script errors)
m (→‎Critiques: Update)
Line 591: Line 591:


==Critiques ==
==Critiques ==
In a recent and well-researched book,<ref>Lewis, James R. ''Violence and New Religious Movements''. Oxford University Press, 2011. ISBN 0199735611.</ref> [[James R. Lewis (scholar)|James R. Lewis]] asserts that there is a "dramatic" number of correlations between [[Ananda Marga]] and [[Mark Juergensmeyer|Mark Juergensmeyer's]] "description of [[#Religion|religious]] groups inclined toward terrorism". After considerable analysis, Lewis concludes that it is probably more appropriate to describe the followers of Sarkar as [[#Revolution|''revolutionary'']] rather than ''terrorist''.  As such, Lewis classifies them as "revolutionary sociospiritual [[Utopia|''utopians'']]".
In a recent book,<ref>Lewis, James R. ''Violence and New Religious Movements''. Oxford University Press, 2011. ISBN 0199735611.</ref> Helen Crovetto asserts that there is a "dramatic" number of correlations between [[Ananda Marga]] and [[Mark Juergensmeyer|Mark Juergensmeyer's]] "description of [[#Religion|religious]] groups inclined toward [[terrorism]]". After considerable analysis, Crovetto concludes that it is probably more appropriate to describe the followers of Sarkar as [[#Revolution|''revolutionary'']] rather than ''terrorist''.  As such, Crovetto classifies them as "revolutionary sociospiritual [[Utopia|''utopians'']]".


==See also==
==See also==

Navigation menu