Sarkarverse:Central discussion forum/Project: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Reply
m (Reply)
Line 20: Line 20:
: Those are not literary. How could a dance or yoga or tantra or an occult power... much less Parama Purusa... be literary? They are non-literary works that also happen to be mentioned in various books. This is the very reason why Prabhat Samgiita is classified as a non-literary work, that is, it transcends the literary field. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 07:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
: Those are not literary. How could a dance or yoga or tantra or an occult power... much less Parama Purusa... be literary? They are non-literary works that also happen to be mentioned in various books. This is the very reason why Prabhat Samgiita is classified as a non-literary work, that is, it transcends the literary field. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 07:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
:* Nonliterary work has these parameters. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 07:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
:* Nonliterary work has these parameters. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 07:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
:: I don't understand your point. Items that are not people or foundations and cannot be pigeonholed as literary are classified as non-literary (even when there is a literary component). --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 06:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


== Infobox project ==
== Infobox project ==

Navigation menu