Sarkarverse: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Extended the history
m (Modified in accordance with revised slogan)
m (Extended the history)
Line 29: Line 29:


== History ==
== History ==
Sarkarverse was officially launched on 2013 October 21 by [[Ac.]] [[Abhidevananda Avadhuta]]. In early 2013, Abhidevananda and a few other editors were working on Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar related articles in Wikipedia (English). There, their series of articles were repeatedly challenged. Many articles were finally deleted or merged, often for lack of [[SV:Secondary sources|secondary sources]]. After the incident, Abhidevananda largely left Wikipedia, storing all of the Sarkar-related articles from Wikipedia on the website [[onlyhis.name]]. In the preface to the early project on that website, Abhidevananda wrote:<ref>[http://archive.is/yu0Am Archived copy of the preface]</ref>
Sarkarverse was officially launched on 2013 October 21 by [[Ac.]] [[Abhidevananda Avadhuta]]. In early 2013, Abhidevananda and a few other editors were working on Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar related articles in [[:wikipedia:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]. There, their series of articles were repeatedly challenged. Even a small article on Sarkar's collection of 5,018 songs, [[Prabhat Samgiita]], required over two weeks (17 days) of [[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Prabhat_Samgiita|heated debate]] just to pass Wikipedia's capitalistic concept of notability. In the end, most of the Sarkar-related articles were deleted, merged, or reduced to trivial and largely misleading content. After this experience, Abhidevananda withdrew from Wikipedia, storing the Sarkar-related articles from Wikipedia on the website [[onlyhis.name]]. In the preface to the early project on that website, Abhidevananda wrote:<ref>[http://archive.is/yu0Am Archived copy of the preface]</ref>


<blockquote>As is well-known, Wikipedia suffers from a considerable amount of systemic bias. Furthermore, many senior editors openly acknowledge that Wikipedia does not "do truth". An over-reliance on secondary sources often results in articles that are nothing but book reviews of book reviews.</blockquote>
<blockquote>As is well-known, Wikipedia suffers from a considerable amount of systemic bias. Furthermore, many senior editors openly acknowledge that Wikipedia does not "do truth". An over-reliance on secondary sources often results in articles that are nothing but book reviews of book reviews.</blockquote>

Navigation menu