User:Titodutta/store/Capitalism: Difference between revisions

m
Tito Dutta moved page Capitalism to User:Titodutta/store/Capitalism without leaving a redirect: Move to own store
m (1 revision)
 
m (Tito Dutta moved page Capitalism to User:Titodutta/store/Capitalism without leaving a redirect: Move to own store)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Economic systems sidebar|expanded=By ideology}}
{{Economic systems sidebar|expanded=By ideology}}


'''Capitalism''' is an [[economic system]] in which [[capital asset]]s are privately owned and goods and services are produced for [[Profit (economics)|profit]] in a [[market economy]]. In a capitalist economy, the parties to a transaction nominally determine the prices at which assets, goods, and services are [[Trade|exchanged]].<ref>Chris Jenks. ''Core Sociological Dichotomies''. "Capitalism, as a mode of production, is an economic system of manufacture and exchange which is geared toward the production and sale of commodities within a market for profit, where the manufacture of commodities consists of the use of the formally free labour of workers in exchange for a wage to create commodities in which the manufacturer extracts surplus value from the labour of the workers in terms of the difference between the wages paid to the worker and the value of the commodity produced by him/her to generate that profit." London, England, UK; Thousand Oaks, California, USA; New Delhi, India: SAGE. p. 383.</ref><ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/capitalism "Capitalism"] ''Oxford Dictionaries''. "capitalism. an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state." Retrieved 4 January 2013.</ref><ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism "an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market"</ref> Central elements of capitalism include the process of [[capital accumulation]], [[Competition (economics)|competitive markets]] and [[wage labor]].<ref>Heilbroner, Robert L.
'''Capitalism''' is an [[economic system]] based on private ownership of the [[means of production]] and [[capital good]]s, and the production of goods and services for [[Profit (economics)|profit]] in a [[market economy]].<ref>Chris Jenks. ''Core Sociological Dichotomies''. "Capitalism, as a mode of production, is an economic system of manufacture and exchange which is geared toward the production and sale of commodities within a market for profit, where the manufacture of commodities consists of the use of the formally free labour of workers in exchange for a wage to create commodities in which the manufacturer extracts surplus value from the labour of the workers in terms of the difference between the wages paid to the worker and the value of the commodity produced by him/her to generate that profit." London, England, UK; Thousand Oaks, California, USA; New Delhi, India: SAGE. p. 383.</ref><ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/capitalism "Capitalism"] ''Oxford Dictionaries''. "capitalism. an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state." Retrieved 4 January 2013.</ref> Central characteristics of capitalism include the process of [[capital accumulation]], [[Competition (economics)|competitive markets]], and [[wage labor]].<ref>Heilbroner, Robert L. [http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000053 "capitalism."] ''The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics''. Second Edition. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume (Eds.).
[http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000053 "capitalism."] ''The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics''. Second Edition. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume (Eds.).
Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. {{DOI|10.1057/9780230226203.0198}}</ref> In a capitalist economy, the parties to a transaction nominally determine the prices at which assets, goods, and services are [[Trade|exchanged]].<ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism "an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market"</ref>  
Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. {{DOI|10.1057/9780230226203.0198}}</ref>


Capitalism has existed under many [[form of government|forms of government]], in many different times, places, and cultures.<ref name="Scott"/> Following the demise of [[feudalism]], capitalism became the dominant economic system in the [[Western world]]. Later, in the 20th century, capitalism overcame a challenge by [[communism]] and is now the dominant system worldwide,<ref name="britannica">{{cite book |title=Capitalism|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica|year=2006}}</ref><ref>James Fulcher, ''Capitalism, A Very Short Introduction'', "In one respect there can, however, be little doubt that capitalism has gone global and that is in the elimination of alternative systems." p. 99, Oxford University Press, 2004, ISBN 978-0-19-280218-7.</ref> with the [[mixed economy]] being its dominant form in the industrialized Western world. Economists, [[political economy|political economists]], and [[history|historians]] have taken different perspectives in their analysis of capitalism and recognized various forms of it in practice. These include [[laissez-faire]] capitalism, [[welfare capitalism]] and [[state capitalism]], all characterizing varying levels of state activity and [[public capital]] control. A pejorative characterization, [[crony capitalism]], refers to a state of affairs in which insider corruption, nepotism and cartels dominate the system. This is considered to be the normal state of mature capitalism in [[Marxian economics]] but as an aberrant state by certain advocates of capitalism.
The degree of competition, role of [[Economic interventionism|intervention]] and regulation, and scope of public ownership varies across different models of capitalism.<ref>''Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics'', 3rd Ed., 1986, p. 54.</ref> Economists, [[political economy|political economists]], and [[history|historians]] have taken different perspectives in their analysis of capitalism and recognized various forms of it in practice. These include ''[[laissez-faire]]'' capitalism, [[welfare capitalism]] and [[state capitalism]]; each highlighting varying degrees of dependency on markets, public ownership, and inclusion of [[Social policy|social policies]]. The extent to which different markets are free, as well as the rules defining private property, is a matter of politics and [[policy]]. Many states have what are termed capitalist [[mixed economy|mixed economies]], referring to a mix between [[planned economy|planned]] and [[market economy|market-driven]] elements.<ref name="Stilwell">Stilwell, Frank. "Political Economy: the Contest of Economic Ideas." First Edition. Oxford University Press. Melbourne, Australia. 2002.</ref> A pejorative characterization, [[crony capitalism]], refers to a state of affairs in which insider corruption, nepotism and cartels dominate the system. This is considered to be the normal state of mature capitalism in [[Marxian economics]].  


[[Laissez-faire]] economists emphasize the degree to which [[government]] does not have control over markets and the importance of [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Tucker, Irvin B.|title=Macroeconomics for Today|page=553|year=1997}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Case, Karl E.|title=Principles of Macroeconomics|publisher=Prentice Hall|year=2004}}</ref> Others emphasize the need for government regulation, to prevent [[monopolies]] and to soften the effects of the [[boom and bust]] cycle.<ref>{{cite book|author=Fulcher, James|title=Capitalism A Very Short Introduction|page=41|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2004}}</ref> Most political economists emphasize private property as well, in addition to [[Economic power|power]] relations, wage labor, [[Economic class|class]], and the uniqueness of capitalism as a historical formation.<ref name="Stilwell"/> The extent to which different markets are free, as well as the rules defining private property, is a matter of politics and [[policy]]. Many states have what are termed [[mixed economy|mixed economies]], referring to a mix between [[planned economy|planned]] and [[market economy|market-driven]] elements in an economic system.<ref name="Stilwell">Stilwell, Frank. "Political Economy: the Contest of Economic Ideas." First Edition. Oxford University Press. Melbourne, Australia. 2002.</ref>
Capitalism has existed under many [[form of government|forms of government]], in many different times, places, and cultures.<ref name="Scott"/> Following the demise of [[feudalism]], capitalism became the dominant economic system in the [[Western world]]. Later, in the 20th century, capitalism overcame a challenge by [[Planned economy|centrally-planned economies]] and is now the dominant system worldwide,<ref name="britannica">{{cite book |title=Capitalism|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica|year=2006}}</ref><ref>James Fulcher, ''Capitalism, A Very Short Introduction'', "In one respect there can, however, be little doubt that capitalism has gone global and that is in the elimination of alternative systems." p. 99, Oxford University Press, 2004, ISBN 978-0-19-280218-7.</ref> with the [[mixed economy]] being its dominant form in the industrialized Western world.


Proponents of capitalism argue that it creates more wealth than any other possible economic system, and that its benefits are mainly to the ordinary person.<ref>Friedman, Milton. ''Capitalism and Freedom''. [Chicago]: University of Chicago, 1962. Print.</ref> Critics of capitalism variously associate it with economic instability<ref>Krugman, Paul, Wells, Robin, ''Economics'', Worth Publishers, New York, (2006)</ref> and an inability to provide for the well-being of all people.<ref>[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html Caritas in veritate paragraph 36]</ref> In contrast to both perspectives, socialists maintain that capitalism is superior to all previously existing economic systems (such as feudalism or slavery) but that [[socialism]] can be better than capitalism.<ref>''The Rise of Capitalism'', 2011. Socialist Standard, no. 1284, August 2011.</ref>
Different economic perspectives emphasize specific elements of capitalism in their preferred definition. ''Laissez-faire'' and [[Economic liberalism|liberal]] economists emphasize the degree to which [[government]] does not have control over markets and the importance of [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Tucker, Irvin B.|title=Macroeconomics for Today|page=553|year=1997}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Case, Karl E.|title=Principles of Macroeconomics|publisher=Prentice Hall|year=2004}}</ref> Neoclassical and Keynesian macro-economists emphasize the need for government regulation to prevent [[monopolies]] and to soften the effects of the [[boom and bust]] cycle.<ref>{{cite book|author=Fulcher, James|title=Capitalism A Very Short Introduction|page=41|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2004}}</ref> Marxian economists emphasize the role of capital accumulation, exploitation and wage labour. Most political economists emphasize private property as well, in addition to [[Economic power|power]] relations, wage labor, [[Economic class|class]], and the uniqueness of capitalism as a historical formation.<ref name="Stilwell"/>  


The term ''capitalism'', in its modern sense, is often attributed to [[Karl Marx]].<ref name="Scott">{{cite book |title=Industrialism: A Dictionary of Sociology|author=Scott, John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title="capitalism, n.2". OED Online|url=http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/27454?rskey=ZVI1hr&result=2&isAdvanced=false}}</ref> However, Marx rarely used the term "capitalism", instead using the phrase "capitalist mode of production" to describe the institutional arrangements of capitalism, and the term "[[law of value]]" to refer to the dynamic of capitalism involving the creation of goods and services for the extraction of [[surplus value]] or profit. The "ism" was used only twice in the more political interpretations of Marx's work, which were primarily authored by [[Friedrich Engels]].
Proponents of capitalism argue that it creates more prosperity than any other possible economic system, and that its benefits are mainly to the ordinary person.<ref>Friedman, Milton. ''Capitalism and Freedom''. [Chicago]: University of Chicago, 1962. Print.</ref> Critics of capitalism variously associate it with economic instability<ref>Krugman, Paul, Wells, Robin, ''Economics'', Worth Publishers, New York, (2006)</ref> and an inability to provide for the well-being of all people.<ref>[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html Caritas in veritate paragraph 36]</ref> In contrast to both perspectives, [[socialist]]s maintain that capitalism is superior to all previously existing economic systems (such as feudalism or slavery) but that a superior form of economic organization is possible or will emerge at some point in the future.<ref>''The Rise of Capitalism'', 2011. Socialist Standard, no. 1284, August 2011.</ref>


In the 20th century defenders of the capitalist system often replaced the term ''capitalism'' with phrases such as ''free enterprise'' and ''private enterprise'' and replaced ''capitalist'' with ''[[rentier capitalism|rentier]]'' and ''[[investor]]'' in reaction to the negative connotations sometimes associated with capitalism.<ref name="Williams 1983 51">{{cite book |last= Williams|first= Raymond |title= Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition|publisher= Oxford University Press|year= 1983|month= |isbn= 0-19-520469-7|page = 51|chapter= Capitalism}}</ref> The author [[Ayn Rand]] attempted a positive moral defense of laissez-faire capitalism as such but in highly romantic or literary terms that did not stand logical or historical scrutiny.<ref>Bass, Robert H. (Spring 2006). "Egoism versus Rights". ''The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies'' 7 (2): 329–349.</ref>
The term ''capitalism'', in its modern sense, is often attributed to [[Karl Marx]].<ref name="Scott">{{cite book |title=Industrialism: A Dictionary of Sociology|author=Scott, John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title="capitalism, n.2". OED Online|url=http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/27454?rskey=ZVI1hr&result=2&isAdvanced=false}}</ref> However, Marx rarely used the term "capitalism", although it was used twice in the more political interpretations of Marx's work, which were primarily authored by [[Friedrich Engels]]. In the 20th century defenders of the capitalist system often replaced the term ''capitalism'' with phrases such as ''free enterprise'' and ''private enterprise'' and replaced ''capitalist'' with ''[[rentier capitalism|rentier]]'' and ''[[investor]]'' in reaction to the negative connotations sometimes associated with capitalism.<ref name="Williams 1983 51">{{cite book |last= Williams|first= Raymond |title= Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition|publisher= Oxford University Press|year= 1983|month= |isbn= 0-19-520469-7|page = 51|chapter= Capitalism}}</ref>
 
By contrast, modern [[welfare economics]] has produced a number of detailed defenses of the mixed capitalist economy based on public ownership of infrastructure and defense of positive human rights such as housing or education. [[Amartya Sen]] in particular, in ''[[Development as Freedom]]'',his Nobel Prize winning work, argued that the optimal economic system is a democratic [[mixed economy]] with a [[welfare state]].<ref>Amartya Sen, ''Development as Freedom''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2013}}.
 
[[Joseph Schumpeter]] predicted that nations would move away from a capitalist model, and embrace lots of socialist ideologies similar to what is seen in many European countries.  He considered it to be the result of a compromise or truce between capitalism and communism, but in reality this topic is actually hotly debated and many people and nations disagree on both sides of the political spectrum.<ref>Yuichi Shionoya, ''Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study''.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  2007.</ref>
 
Developed economies of the 21st century employ varying degrees of ideas from Laissez-faire economics. The United States limits taxes and government services to about 22% of GDP according to information provided by the US Government run website, the CIA World Fact Book.  Excluding social security services, US government services and taxes account for about 15.6% of GDP.<ref>US Government. "Cia World Fact book". (2013). Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html</ref>  However, in recent years the United States, while still extremely productive, has been struggling with slow economic growth and high unemployment.  Another example is Singapore, an extremely wealthy developed country with a commitment to low taxes.  Taxes and public services contribute to only 15% of Singaporian GDP.<ref>US Government.  "CIA World Factbook".(2013). Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sn.html</ref>


==Economic elements==
==Economic elements==
Line 29: Line 22:
Capitalism is defined as a social and economic system in which capital assets are mainly owned and controlled by private persons, labor is purchased for money wages, capital gains accrue to private owners, and the price mechanism is utilized to allocate capital goods between uses. The extent to which the price mechanism is used, the degree of competitiveness, and government intervention in markets distinguish exact forms of capitalism.<ref>''Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics'', 3rd Ed., 1986, p. 54.</ref>
Capitalism is defined as a social and economic system in which capital assets are mainly owned and controlled by private persons, labor is purchased for money wages, capital gains accrue to private owners, and the price mechanism is utilized to allocate capital goods between uses. The extent to which the price mechanism is used, the degree of competitiveness, and government intervention in markets distinguish exact forms of capitalism.<ref>''Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics'', 3rd Ed., 1986, p. 54.</ref>


There are different variations of capitalism which have different relationships to markets and the state. In free-market and [[laissez-faire]] forms of capitalism, markets are utilized most extensively with minimal or no regulation over the pricing mechanism. In [[State intervention|interventionist]] and mixed economies, markets continue to play a dominant role but are regulated to some extent by government in order to correct [[market failure]]s, promote [[social welfare]], conserve natural resources, and fund [[military|defense]] and [[public safety]]. In [[state capitalist]] systems, markets are relied upon the least, with the state relying heavily on [[state-owned enterprises]] or indirect economic planning to accumulate capital.
There are different variations of capitalism which have different relationships to markets and the state. In free-market and ''[[laissez-faire]]'' forms of capitalism, markets are utilized most extensively with minimal or no regulation over the pricing mechanism. In [[State intervention|interventionist]] and mixed economies, markets continue to play a dominant role but are regulated to some extent by government in order to correct [[market failure]]s, promote [[social welfare]], conserve natural resources, and fund [[military|defense]] and [[public safety]]. In [[state capitalist]] systems, markets are relied upon the least, with the state relying heavily on [[state-owned enterprises]] or indirect economic planning to accumulate capital.


Capitalism and capitalist economics is generally considered to be the opposite of [[socialism]], which contrasts with all forms of capitalism in the following ways: [[social ownership]] of the means of production, where returns on the means of production accrue to society at large, and goods and services are produced [[Production for use|directly for their utility]] (as opposed to being produced by profit-seeking businesses).
Capitalism and capitalist economics is generally considered to be the opposite of [[socialism]], which contrasts with all forms of capitalism in the following ways: [[social ownership]] of the means of production, where returns on the means of production accrue to society at large, and goods and services are produced [[Production for use|directly for their utility]] (as opposed to being produced by profit-seeking businesses).
Line 36: Line 29:
Money is primarily a standardized medium of exchange, and final means of payment, that serves to measure the value of all goods and commodities in a standard of value. It is an abstraction of economic value and medium of exchange that eliminates the cumbersome system of [[barter]] by separating the transactions involved in the exchange of products, thus greatly facilitating specialization and trade through encouraging the exchange of commodities. Capitalism involves the further abstraction of money into other exchangeable [[asset]]s and the accumulation of money through ownership, exchange, interest and various other [[financial instrument]]s.
Money is primarily a standardized medium of exchange, and final means of payment, that serves to measure the value of all goods and commodities in a standard of value. It is an abstraction of economic value and medium of exchange that eliminates the cumbersome system of [[barter]] by separating the transactions involved in the exchange of products, thus greatly facilitating specialization and trade through encouraging the exchange of commodities. Capitalism involves the further abstraction of money into other exchangeable [[asset]]s and the accumulation of money through ownership, exchange, interest and various other [[financial instrument]]s.


[[Capital (economics)|Capital]] in this sense refers to money used to buy something only in order to sell it again to realize a financial profit.
[[Capital (economics)|Capital]] in this sense refers to money used to buy something only in order to sell it again to realize a financial profit. {{cn|date=October 2013}}


The [[accumulation of capital]] refers to the process of "making money", or growing an initial sum of money through investment in production. Capitalism is based around the accumulation of capital, whereby [[financial capital]] is invested in order to realize a profit and then reinvested into further production in a continuous process of accumulation. In Marxian economic theory, this dynamic is called the [[law of value]].
The [[accumulation of capital]] refers to the process of "making money", or growing an initial sum of money through investment in production. Capitalism is based around the accumulation of capital, whereby [[financial capital]] is invested in order to realize a profit and then reinvested into further production in a continuous process of accumulation. In Marxian economic theory, this dynamic is called the [[law of value]].
Line 66: Line 59:
===Free-market capitalism===
===Free-market capitalism===
{{See also|Free market|Laissez-faire}}
{{See also|Free market|Laissez-faire}}
Free-market capitalism refers to an economic system where prices for goods and services are set freely by the forces of supply and demand and are allowed to reach their point of equilibrium without intervention by government policy. It typically entails support for highly competitive markets, private ownership of productive enterprises. [[Laissez-faire]] is a more extensive form of free-market capitalism where the role of the state is limited to protecting [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].
Free-market capitalism refers to an economic system where prices for goods and services are set freely by the forces of supply and demand and are allowed to reach their point of equilibrium without intervention by government policy. It typically entails support for highly competitive markets, private ownership of productive enterprises. ''Laissez-faire'' is a more extensive form of free-market capitalism where the role of the state is limited to protecting [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].


===Social-market economy===
===Social-market economy===
Line 116: Line 109:
* Free-enterprise economy <ref name="britannica"/><ref name="rogetfreeenterprise">"free enterprise." Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition. Philip Lief Group 2008.</ref>
* Free-enterprise economy <ref name="britannica"/><ref name="rogetfreeenterprise">"free enterprise." Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition. Philip Lief Group 2008.</ref>
* [[Free market]]<ref name="rogetfreeenterprise"/><ref name="mutualist">[http://www.mutualist.org/ Mutualist.org]. "...&nbsp;based on voluntary cooperation, free exchange, or mutual aid."</ref>
* [[Free market]]<ref name="rogetfreeenterprise"/><ref name="mutualist">[http://www.mutualist.org/ Mutualist.org]. "...&nbsp;based on voluntary cooperation, free exchange, or mutual aid."</ref>
* [[Laissez-faire]] economy <ref name=Barrons>Barrons Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms. 1995. p. 74</ref>
* ''[[Laissez-faire]]'' economy <ref name=Barrons>Barrons Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms. 1995. p. 74</ref>
* [[Market economy]] <ref>[http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/unabridged?va=market%20economy "Market economy"], Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary</ref>
* [[Market economy]] <ref>[http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/unabridged?va=market%20economy "Market economy"], Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary</ref>
* [[Market liberalism]] <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/about.php |title=About Cato |publisher=Cato.org |date= |accessdate=6 November 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/university/module10.html |title=The Achievements of Nineteenth-Century Classical Liberalism }} <blockquote>Although the term "liberalism" retains its original meaning in most of the world, it has unfortunately come to have a very different meaning in late twentieth-century America. Hence terms such as "market liberalism," "classical liberalism," or "libertarianism" are often used in its place in America.</blockquote></ref>
* [[Market liberalism]] <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/about.php |title=About Cato |publisher=Cato.org |date= |accessdate=6 November 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/university/module10.html |title=The Achievements of Nineteenth-Century Classical Liberalism }} <blockquote>Although the term "liberalism" retains its original meaning in most of the world, it has unfortunately come to have a very different meaning in late twentieth-century America. Hence terms such as "market liberalism," "classical liberalism," or "libertarianism" are often used in its place in America.</blockquote></ref>
Line 172: Line 165:
</ref> These companies profited from the [[colonialism|colonial]] and [[expansionism|expansionary]] powers given to them by nation-states.<ref name="Banaji" /> During this era, merchants, who had traded under the previous stage of mercantilism, invested capital in the East India Companies and other colonies, seeking a [[return on investment]].
</ref> These companies profited from the [[colonialism|colonial]] and [[expansionism|expansionary]] powers given to them by nation-states.<ref name="Banaji" /> During this era, merchants, who had traded under the previous stage of mercantilism, invested capital in the East India Companies and other colonies, seeking a [[return on investment]].


In his ''History of Economic Analysis'', [[Joseph Schumpeter]] reduced mercantilist propositions to three main concerns:<ref>Schumpeter, J.A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis</ref>
[[Joseph Schumpeter]] predicted that nations would move away from a capitalist model, and embrace lots of socialist ideologies similar to what is seen in many European countries.  He considered it to be the result of a compromise or truce between capitalism and communism, but in reality this topic is actually hotly debated and many people and nations disagree on both sides of the political spectrum.<ref>Yuichi Shionoya, ''Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study''.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  2007.</ref> In his ''History of Economic Analysis'', Schumpeter reduced mercantilist propositions to three main concerns:<ref>Schumpeter, J. A. (1954) ''History of Economic Analysis''</ref>


# exchange controls
# exchange controls
Line 205: Line 198:


===Communism===
===Communism===
After the [[Russian Revolution]] of 1917, but prior to the collapse of the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]] and the [[COMECON]] trade bloc in the 1990s, and before China's shift to a more open [[state capitalism]] in the 1980s through 1990s, it was common to contrast [[communism]] with capitalism.  This is far less common in the 21st century.  Accordingly the understanding of the term has shifted markedly, as the alternatives to capitalism are no longer generally understood as [[authoritarianism|authoritarian]] or [[totalitarian]].  A great deal of 20th century literature on the topic would be almost incomprehensible to modern readers, even knowing this context and history.  For instance, the defense of capitalism against communism (or of [[Christianity]] or [[democracy]] against communism, far more common prior to the 1980s), and the suggestion that the conflict between the two systems might lead to [[nuclear warfare|global thermonuclear war]], would be very difficult to explain to someone who had not lived through some part of the [[Cold War]], or seen [[Tiananmen Square]] attacked, or experienced the [[Velvet Revolution]] of Eastern Europe in the 90s.{{citation needed|date=June 2013}}
{{No footnotes|date=October 2013}}
{{Main|Communism}}
After the [[Russian Revolution]] of 1917, but prior to the collapse of the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]] and the [[COMECON]] trade bloc in the 1990s, and before China's shift to a more open [[state capitalism]] in the 1980s through 1990s, it was common to contrast [[communism]] with capitalism.  This is far less common in the 21st century.  Accordingly the understanding of the term has shifted markedly, as the alternatives to capitalism are no longer generally understood as [[authoritarianism|authoritarian]] or [[totalitarian]].  A great deal of 20th century literature on the topic would be almost incomprehensible to modern readers, even knowing this context and history.   


Like capitalism, communism has also been characterized in many different ways, and has seen real (and extreme) variations in terms of respect of human rights, rule of law, and equal opportunity for gender and race.  In early works (1858–1917) many of the references to communism are to elements it has in common with modern democracies, such as mixed economies, universal health care, literacy, housing, collective bargaining rights for labour, and limits to inherited class privilege.  The perceived communist threat, and the conflation by some writers of communism and [[socialism]], played a role in the evolution and establishment of modern economies, though how much is hotly debated.
Like capitalism, communism has also been characterized in many different ways, and has seen real (and extreme) variations in terms of respect of human rights, rule of law, and equal opportunity for gender and race.  In early works (1858–1917) many of the references to communism are to elements it has in common with modern democracies, such as mixed economies, universal health care, literacy, housing, collective bargaining rights for labour, and limits to inherited class privilege.  The perceived communist threat, and the conflation by some writers of communism and [[socialism]], played a role in the evolution and establishment of modern economies, though how much is hotly debated.
Line 217: Line 212:
After [[World War II]], a broad array of new analytical tools in the [[social sciences]] were developed to explain the social and economic trends of the period, including the concepts of [[post-industrial society]] and the [[welfare state]].<ref name="Burnham" /> This era was greatly influenced by [[Keynesian]] economic stabilization policies. The postwar boom ended in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the situation was worsened by the rise of [[stagflation]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Barnes, Trevor J.|title=Reading economic geography|publisher=Blackwell Publishing|isbn=0-631-23554-X|page=127|year=2004}}</ref>
After [[World War II]], a broad array of new analytical tools in the [[social sciences]] were developed to explain the social and economic trends of the period, including the concepts of [[post-industrial society]] and the [[welfare state]].<ref name="Burnham" /> This era was greatly influenced by [[Keynesian]] economic stabilization policies. The postwar boom ended in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the situation was worsened by the rise of [[stagflation]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Barnes, Trevor J.|title=Reading economic geography|publisher=Blackwell Publishing|isbn=0-631-23554-X|page=127|year=2004}}</ref>


In particular, [[monetarism]], a theoretical alternative to Keynesianism that is more compatible with laissez-faire, gained increasing prominence in the capitalist world, especially under the leadership of [[Ronald Reagan]] in the US and [[Margaret Thatcher]] in the UK in the 1980s. Public and political interest began shifting away from the so-called [[collectivist]] concerns of Keynes's managed capitalism to a focus on individual choice, called "remarketized capitalism." <ref name="Fulcher, James 2004">Fulcher, James. Capitalism. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.</ref>  In the eyes of many economic and political commentators, the collapse of the [[Soviet Union]] brought further evidence of the superiority of market capitalism over planned economy.
In particular, [[monetarism]], a theoretical alternative to Keynesianism that is more compatible with ''laissez-faire'', gained increasing prominence in the capitalist world, especially under the leadership of [[Ronald Reagan]] in the US and [[Margaret Thatcher]] in the UK in the 1980s. Public and political interest began shifting away from the so-called [[collectivist]] concerns of Keynes's managed capitalism to a focus on individual choice, called "remarketized capitalism." <ref name="Fulcher, James 2004">Fulcher, James. Capitalism. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.</ref>  In the eyes of many economic and political commentators, the collapse of the [[Soviet Union]] brought further evidence of the superiority of market capitalism over planned economy.
 
===Welfare economics===
Modern [[welfare economics]] has produced a number of detailed defenses of the mixed capitalist economy based on public ownership of infrastructure and defense of positive human rights such as housing or education. [[Amartya Sen]] in particular, in ''[[Development as Freedom]]'', his Nobel Prize winning work, argued that the optimal economic system is a democratic [[mixed economy]] with a [[welfare state]].<ref>Amartya Sen, ''Development as Freedom''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2013}}.


===Globalization===
===Globalization===
Line 305: Line 303:
Essentially rejecting [[Say's law]], he argued that some people may have a [[liquidity preference]] that would see them rather hold money than buy new goods or services, which therefore raised the prospect that the [[Great Depression]] would not end without what he termed in the ''General Theory'' "a somewhat comprehensive socialization of investment."
Essentially rejecting [[Say's law]], he argued that some people may have a [[liquidity preference]] that would see them rather hold money than buy new goods or services, which therefore raised the prospect that the [[Great Depression]] would not end without what he termed in the ''General Theory'' "a somewhat comprehensive socialization of investment."


Keynesian economics challenged the notion that laissez-faire capitalist economics could operate well on their own, without state intervention used to promote [[aggregate demand]], fighting high unemployment and [[Deflation (economics)|deflation]] of the sort seen during the 1930s. He and his followers recommended "[[Deficit spending|pump-priming]]" the economy to avoid [[recession]]: cutting taxes, increasing government borrowing, and spending during an economic down-turn. This was to be accompanied by trying to control wages nationally partly through the use of [[inflation]] to cut real wages and to deter people from holding money.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1969/marx-keynes/ch01.htm |title=Marx and Keynes: the limits of the mixed economy |author=Paul Mattick |accessdate=26 February 2008|publisher=Marxists }}</ref>
Keynesian economics challenged the notion that ''laissez-faire'' capitalist economics could operate well on their own, without state intervention used to promote [[aggregate demand]], fighting high unemployment and [[Deflation (economics)|deflation]] of the sort seen during the 1930s. He and his followers recommended "[[Deficit spending|pump-priming]]" the economy to avoid [[recession]]: cutting taxes, increasing government borrowing, and spending during an economic down-turn. This was to be accompanied by trying to control wages nationally partly through the use of [[inflation]] to cut real wages and to deter people from holding money.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1969/marx-keynes/ch01.htm |title=Marx and Keynes: the limits of the mixed economy |author=Paul Mattick |accessdate=26 February 2008|publisher=Marxists }}</ref>


John Maynard Keynes tried to provide solutions to many of Marx's problems without completely abandoning the classical understanding of capitalism. His work attempted to show that regulation can be effective, and that economic stabilizers can rein in the aggressive expansions and recessions that Marx disliked. These changes sought to create more stability in the business cycle, and reduce the abuses of laborers. Keynesian economists argue that Keynesian policies were one of the primary reasons capitalism was able to recover following the Great Depression.<ref>Erhardt III, Erwin. "History of Economic Development." University of Cincinnati. Lindner Center Auditorium, Cincinnati. 7 November 2008.</ref> The premises of Keynes's work have, however, since been challenged by neoclassical and [[supply-side economics]] and the Austrian School.
John Maynard Keynes tried to provide solutions to many of Marx's problems without completely abandoning the classical understanding of capitalism. His work attempted to show that regulation can be effective, and that economic stabilizers can rein in the aggressive expansions and recessions that Marx disliked. These changes sought to create more stability in the business cycle, and reduce the abuses of laborers. Keynesian economists argue that Keynesian policies were one of the primary reasons capitalism was able to recover following the Great Depression.<ref>Erhardt III, Erwin. "History of Economic Development." University of Cincinnati. Lindner Center Auditorium, Cincinnati. 7 November 2008.</ref> The premises of Keynes's work have, however, since been challenged by neoclassical and [[supply-side economics]] and the Austrian School.
Line 319: Line 317:
[[Milton Friedman]] took many of the basic principles set forth by Adam Smith and the classical economists and gave them a new twist. One example of this is his article in the September 1970 issue of ''The New York Times'' Magazine, where he argues that the social responsibility of business is "to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits&nbsp;... (through) open and free competition without deception or fraud." This is similar to Smith's argument that self-interest in turn benefits the whole of society.<ref>Friedman, Milton. "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits." ''The New York Times Magazine'' 13 September 1970.</ref> Work like this helped lay the foundations for the coming [[marketization]] (or [[privatization]]) of state enterprises and the [[supply-side economics]] of [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]].
[[Milton Friedman]] took many of the basic principles set forth by Adam Smith and the classical economists and gave them a new twist. One example of this is his article in the September 1970 issue of ''The New York Times'' Magazine, where he argues that the social responsibility of business is "to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits&nbsp;... (through) open and free competition without deception or fraud." This is similar to Smith's argument that self-interest in turn benefits the whole of society.<ref>Friedman, Milton. "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits." ''The New York Times Magazine'' 13 September 1970.</ref> Work like this helped lay the foundations for the coming [[marketization]] (or [[privatization]]) of state enterprises and the [[supply-side economics]] of [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]].


The [[Chicago school (economics)|Chicago School of economics]] is best known for its free market advocacy and [[monetarist]] ideas. According to Friedman and other monetarists, market economies are inherently stable [[laissez-faire|if left to themselves]] and depressions result only from government intervention.<ref>{{cite book |title=Macroeconomics and New Macroeconomics|author=Felderer, Bernhard}}</ref>
The [[Chicago school (economics)|Chicago School of economics]] is best known for its free market advocacy and [[monetarist]] ideas. According to Friedman and other monetarists, market economies are inherently stable if left to themselves and depressions result only from government intervention.<ref>{{cite book |title=Macroeconomics and New Macroeconomics|author=Felderer, Bernhard}}</ref>


Friedman, for example, argued that the [[Great Depression]] was result of a contraction of the money supply, controlled by the [[Federal Reserve System|Federal Reserve]], and not by the lack of investment as [[John Maynard Keynes]] had argued. [[Ben Bernanke]], current Chairman of the [[Federal Reserve]], is among the economists today generally accepting Friedman's analysis of the causes of the Great Depression.<ref name="fed">{{cite web |url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021108/default.htm|title=Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke  |publisher=The Federal Reserve Board|accessdate=26 February 2008|date=8 November 2002|author=Ben Bernanke}}</ref>
Friedman, for example, argued that the [[Great Depression]] was result of a contraction of the money supply, controlled by the [[Federal Reserve System|Federal Reserve]], and not by the lack of investment as [[John Maynard Keynes]] had argued. [[Ben Bernanke]], current Chairman of the [[Federal Reserve]], is among the economists today generally accepting Friedman's analysis of the causes of the Great Depression.<ref name="fed">{{cite web |url=http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021108/default.htm|title=Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke  |publisher=The Federal Reserve Board|accessdate=26 February 2008|date=8 November 2002|author=Ben Bernanke}}</ref>
Line 391: Line 389:


===Political freedom===
===Political freedom===
In his book ''[[The Road to Serfdom]]'', Freidrich Hayek reasons that the [[economic freedom]] of capitalism is a requisite of [[political freedom]]. The argument he puts forward is that the market mechanism is the only way of deciding what to produce and how to distribute the items without using coercion. Milton Friedman further repeated the statement which has been continuously echoed by others such as Andrew Brennan and Ronald Reagan. Friedman stated that centralized operations of economic activity is always accompanied by [[political repression]]. In his view, transactions in a market economy are voluntary, and the wide diversity that voluntary activity permits is a fundamental threat to repressive political leaders and greatly diminish power to coerce. Friedman's view was also shared by John Maynard Keynes, who believed that capitalism is vital for freedom to survive and thrive.<ref>{{cite book |author=Friedrich Hayek|title=The Road to Serfdom|publisher=[[University Of Chicago Press]] |year=1944|isbn=0-226-32061-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Bellamy, Richard|title=The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003|isbn=0-521-56354-2|page=60}}</ref>
In his book ''[[The Road to Serfdom]]'', [[Freidrich Hayek]] reasons that the [[economic freedom]] of capitalism is a requisite of [[political freedom]]. He argues that the market mechanism is the only way of deciding what to produce and how to distribute the items without using coercion. [[Milton Friedman]], [[Andrew Brennan]] and [[Ronald Reagan]] also promoted this view. Friedman claimed that centralized economic operations are always accompanied by [[political repression]]. In his view, transactions in a market economy are voluntary, and that the wide diversity that voluntary activity permits is a fundamental threat to repressive political leaders and greatly diminish their power to coerce. Some of Friedman's views were shared by [[John Maynard Keynes]], who believed that capitalism is vital for freedom to survive and thrive.<ref>{{cite book |author=Friedrich Hayek|title=The Road to Serfdom|publisher=[[University Of Chicago Press]] |year=1944|isbn=0-226-32061-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Bellamy, Richard|title=The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003|isbn=0-521-56354-2|page=60}}</ref>
 
[[Ayn Rand]] attempted a positive moral defense of ''laissez-faire'' capitalism, most notably in her 1957 novel ''[[Atlas Shrugged]]''. She insisted that capitalism should be supported on moral grounds, not just on the basis of practical benefits.<ref>{{cite book |first=Jennifer |last=Burns |chapter=Godless Capitalism: Ayn Rand and the Conservative Movement |title=American Capitalism: Social Thought and Political Economy in the Twentieth Century |editor-first=Nelson (ed.) |editor-last=Lichtenstein |location=Philadelphia |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8122-3923-2 |pages=282-283}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first1=Douglas |last1=Den Uyl |first2=Douglas |last2=Rasmussen |first2=Douglas |chapter=Capitalism |title=[[The Philosophic Thought of Ayn Rand]] |editor1-last=Den Uyl |editor1-first=Douglas |editor2-last=Rasmussen |editor2-first=Douglas (eds.) |authorlink2=Douglas B. Rasmussen |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Illinois Press |year=1984 |isbn=0-252-01033-7 |oclc=9392804 |lastauthoramp=y |pages=173-174}}</ref> Her views have been ignored or rejected by many critics, but she has significantly influenced conservative and [[libertarianism|libertarian]] defenders of capitalism, especially in the American [[Tea Party movement]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Ayn Rand Nation: The Hidden Struggle for America's Soul |last=Weiss |first=Gary |authorlink=Gary Weiss |location=New York |publisher=St. Martin's Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-312-59073-4 |oclc=740628885 |pages=14-16}}</ref>


===Self-organization===
===Self-organization===
14,061

edits