84,762
edits
Progressive Utilization Theory: Difference between revisions
Progressive Utilization Theory (view source)
Revision as of 14:32, 9 September 2014
, 9 September 2014Added link and modified SEO slightly
m (SEO: more keywords) |
m (Added link and modified SEO slightly) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=PROUT | |title=PROUT | ||
|titlemode=prepend | |titlemode=prepend | ||
|keywords= | |keywords=progressive utilization theory,prout,economics,law,politics,social justice,sarkar,economic democracy,crime,social cycle,five fundamental principles,progress,wealth gap,world government,socioeconomic zones,balanced economy,quadridimensional economics,people's economy,psycho-economy,prama,women's rights,social change,sadvipra | ||
|description=broad introduction to PROUT | |description=broad introduction to PROUT | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Sarkar introduced PROUT in 1959. In 1962, he formally outlined PROUT. Throughout the rest of his life, he continually amplified the subject. | Sarkar introduced PROUT in 1959. In 1962, he formally outlined PROUT. Throughout the rest of his life, he continually amplified the subject. | ||
PROUT is not concerned solely with [[:wikipedia:Property rights|property rights]] and economics. Rather, it encompasses the whole of individual and collective existence, not just for human beings but for all beings. Supporters of PROUT (proutists) claim that the theory overcomes the limitations of both capitalism and communism.<ref>Craig, Edward, ed. (1998). ''Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Sociology of Knowledge to Zoroastrianism''. Routledge (Taylor & Francis). ISBN 0-415-16916-X.</ref> | PROUT is not concerned solely with [[:wikipedia:Property rights|property rights]] and [[:wikipedia:Economics|economics]]. Rather, it encompasses the whole of individual and collective existence, not just for human beings but for all beings. Supporters of PROUT (proutists) claim that the theory overcomes the limitations of both capitalism and communism.<ref>Craig, Edward, ed. (1998). ''Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Sociology of Knowledge to Zoroastrianism''. Routledge (Taylor & Francis). ISBN 0-415-16916-X.</ref> | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||