14,061
edits
Talk:Portal:Prabhat Samgiita: Difference between revisions
→Categorization: Reply
m (Reply) |
(→Categorization: Reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (or something so) | ** [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (or something so) | ||
** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category) | ** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category) | ||
** [[:Category: | ** [[:Category:Films on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events") | ||
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
: Yes, that makes sense. "Songs on PROUT" or "Songs on PROUT" might be simpler than "Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory", but you may set that up whichever way you feel best. For now, I think we only need "Songs on PROUT" and "Songs on neohumanism". The other themes are more generic and probably not requiring categories yet. When we have more songs posted, we could add categories for seasons and festivals and ceremonies and birthdays and so on. Right now, I think we can get by without that, examining this again when we have, say, 1,000 songs posted on Sarkarverse. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 16:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | : Yes, that makes sense. "Songs on PROUT" or "Songs on PROUT" might be simpler than "Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory", but you may set that up whichever way you feel best. Or you could create a redirect for one of the two. For now, I think we only need "Songs on PROUT" and "Songs on neohumanism". The other themes are more generic and probably not requiring categories yet. When we have more songs posted, we could add categories for seasons and festivals and ceremonies and birthdays and so on. Right now, I think we can get by without that, examining this again when we have, say, 1,000 songs posted on Sarkarverse. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 16:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:* ''Namaste'', now we have [[:Category:Songs on PROUT]] and [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]]. We may need to set a convention for "Books on" "Films on" etc. article. <br/>The article categorization work may be done using replacetool or script or AWB. Let me know if I need to do this. Regards. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 23:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||