Template:Featured list candidates/editintro: Difference between revisions

clean up
(Sarkarversify)
(clean up)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
<h3>Read this before submitting a list for featured list candidacy</h3>
<h3>Read this before submitting a list for featured list candidacy</h3>


Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the [[Sarkarverse:Featured list criteria|FL criteria]] and that [[WP:PR|peer reviews]] are closed and archived. A list should not be on [[WP:FLC|Featured list candidates]] and [[WP:PR|Peer review]] at the same time.  
Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the [[Sarkarverse:Featured list criteria|FL criteria]] and that [[SV:PR|peer reviews]] are closed and archived. A list should not be on [[SV:FLC|Featured list candidates]] and [[SV:PR|Peer review]] at the same time.  


Nominators who are not [http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl significant contributors to the list] should consult regular editors of the list before nomination.  Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve ''critical'' comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.  
Nominators who are not [http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl significant contributors to the list] should consult regular editors of the list before nomination.  Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve ''critical'' comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.  
14,061

edits