User talk:Abhidevananda: Difference between revisions

User talk:Abhidevananda (view source)

365 bytes added , 14 October 2014

m

Reply

84,999

edits

Revision as of 19:40, 13 October 2014 (view source) T12 (talk \| contribs) (→‎First year reassessment: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:16, 14 October 2014 (view source) Abhidevananda (talk \| contribs) m (Reply) Newer edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:

	I suggest to start the first year's reassessment. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta\|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta\|Dutta]]</span> 19:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)		I suggest to start the first year's reassessment. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta\|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta\|Dutta]]</span> 19:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
			:Why not just "assessment"? Why re-assess? And let's leave the assessment process (review, defect, solution) until we have more to consider and more people to consider it with. We can then chalk out the appropriate venue and ground rules for such an assessment. --[[User:Abhidevananda\|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda\|talk]]) 02:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)