Sarkarverse:Ownership of articles: Difference between revisions

add
(add)
(add)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About|control over an article's text|the ownership of copyright in an article|Wikipedia:Copyrights}}
{{About|control over an article's text|the ownership of copyright in an article|Sarkarverse:Copyrights}}
{{Policy|SV:OWN|SV:OWNER|SV:OOA}}
{{Policy|SV:OWN|SV:OWNER|SV:OOA}}
{{nutshell|
{{nutshell|
No one "owns" an article or any page at Wikipedia. If you create or edit an article, others can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so. In addition, you should not undo their edits without good reason. Disagreements should be [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|calmly resolved]], starting with a discussion on the article talk page.}}
No one "owns" an article or any page at Sarkarverse. If you create or edit an article, others can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so. In addition, you should not undo their edits without good reason. Disagreements should be [[Sarkarverse:Dispute resolution|calmly resolved]], starting with a discussion on the article talk page.}}
{{conduct policy list}}
{{conduct policy list}}


All [[Wikipedia]] content − articles, categories, templates, and other types of pages − is edited collaboratively. {{strong|No one}}, no matter how skilled, or of how high standing in the community, has the right to act as though he or she is the ''owner'' of a particular page.
All [[Sarkarverse]] content − articles, categories, templates, and other types of pages − is edited collaboratively. {{strong|No one}}, no matter how skilled, or of how high standing in the community, has the right to act as though he or she is the ''owner'' of a particular page.


Some contributors feel possessive about material they have contributed to Wikipedia. A few editors will even defend such material against others. It is quite reasonable to take an interest in an article on a topic you care about − perhaps you are an expert, or perhaps it is just your hobby; however, if this watchfulness starts to become possessiveness, then you are overdoing it. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a [[Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes|common mistake]] people make on Wikipedia.
Some contributors feel possessive about material they have contributed to Sarkarverse. A few editors will even defend such material against others. It is quite reasonable to take an interest in an article on a topic you care about − perhaps you are an expert, or perhaps it is just your hobby; however, if this watchfulness starts to become possessiveness, then you are overdoing it. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a [[Sarkarverse:Avoiding common mistakes|common mistake]] people make on Sarkarverse.
14,061

edits