Talk:Portal:Prabhat Samgiita: Difference between revisions

From Sarkarverse
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Categorization: new section)
(→‎Categorization: I forgot date)
Line 24: Line 24:
** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category)
** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category)
** [[:Category:Movies on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events")
** [[:Category:Movies on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events")
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span>
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:12, 2 December 2014

Songs by years

should not be categorize songsof PS by year as we are doing for discourses eg. Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx? )I can not recall whether I have discussed it already). --TitoDutta 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

That seems reasonable. Perhaps we could add this to the template. --Abhidevananda (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Or just "Songs given in 19xx". As far as I know, all of Baba's songs were Prabhat Samgiita. --Abhidevananda (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Mentioning Prabhat Samgiita could be helpful for clarification as it directly gets into our other articles naming conventions. Please check once again, so that I can start work. --TitoDutta 10:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't see any advantage in having a category that is "Prabhat Samgiita songs..." rather than just "Songs...", but do whatever you think best. --Abhidevananda (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Okay, I'll do it. Regards. --TitoDutta 10:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Please note

I was reading this article Ajker ei shishutaru and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --TitoDutta 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --Abhidevananda (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Categorization

Namaste,
As we are categorizing song articles, I feel we may use sub-categories as well, like—

Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.
This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --TitoDutta 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)