Talk:Portal:Prabhat Samgiita: Difference between revisions
(→Songs by years: Re) |
(→Categorization: new section) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I was reading this article [[Ajker ei shishutaru]] and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | I was reading this article [[Ajker ei shishutaru]] and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | :Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Categorization == | |||
Namaste,<br/> | |||
As we are categorizing song articles, I feel we may use sub-categories as well, like— | |||
* [[:Category:Progressive Utilization Theory]] (parent category) | |||
** [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (or something so) | |||
** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category) | |||
** [[:Category:Movies on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events") | |||
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> |
Revision as of 10:11, 2 December 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portal:Prabhat Samgiita article. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Songs by years
should not be categorize songsof PS by year as we are doing for discourses eg. Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx? )I can not recall whether I have discussed it already). --Tito☸Dutta 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable. Perhaps we could add this to the template. --Abhidevananda (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please suggest exact category name, is Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx okay? I'll start working here very soon. --Tito☸Dutta 09:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Or just "Songs given in 19xx". As far as I know, all of Baba's songs were Prabhat Samgiita. --Abhidevananda (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Mentioning Prabhat Samgiita could be helpful for clarification as it directly gets into our other articles naming conventions. Please check once again, so that I can start work. --Tito☸Dutta 10:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see any advantage in having a category that is "Prabhat Samgiita songs..." rather than just "Songs...", but do whatever you think best. --Abhidevananda (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Please note
I was reading this article Ajker ei shishutaru and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --Tito☸Dutta 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --Abhidevananda (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Categorization
Namaste,
As we are categorizing song articles, I feel we may use sub-categories as well, like—
- Category:Progressive Utilization Theory (parent category)
- Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory (or something so)
- Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory (we have this category)
- Category:Movies on Progressive Utilization Theory (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events")
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.
This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --Tito☸Dutta