Talk:Portal:Prabhat Samgiita: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Please note: new section) |
(→Categorization: Reply) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
should not be categorize songsof PS by year as we are doing for discourses eg. [[:Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx]]? )I can not recall whether I have discussed it already). --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | should not be categorize songsof PS by year as we are doing for discourses eg. [[:Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx]]? )I can not recall whether I have discussed it already). --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:That seems reasonable. Perhaps we could add this to the template. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 03:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | :That seems reasonable. Perhaps we could add this to the template. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 03:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
* Please suggest exact category name, is [[:Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx]] okay? I'll start working here very soon. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: Or just "Songs given in 19xx". As far as I know, all of Baba's songs were Prabhat Samgiita. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 09:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: Mentioning Prabhat Samgiita could be helpful for clarification as it directly gets into our other articles naming conventions. Please check once again, so that I can start work. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: I don't see any advantage in having a category that is "Prabhat Samgiita songs..." rather than just "Songs...", but do whatever you think best. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 10:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
::* Okay, I'll do it. Regards. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Please note == | == Please note == | ||
I was reading this article [[Ajker ei shishutaru]] and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | I was reading this article [[Ajker ei shishutaru]] and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Categorization == | |||
Namaste,<br/> | |||
As we are categorizing song articles, I feel we may use sub-categories as well, like— | |||
* [[:Category:Progressive Utilization Theory]] (parent category) | |||
** [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (or something so) | |||
** [[:Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (we have this category) | |||
** [[:Category:Films on Progressive Utilization Theory]] (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events") | |||
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.<br/>This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
: Yes, that makes sense. "Songs on PROUT" or "Songs on PROUT" might be simpler than "Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory", but you may set that up whichever way you feel best. Or you could create a redirect for one of the two. For now, I think we only need "Songs on PROUT" and "Songs on neohumanism". The other themes are more generic and probably not requiring categories yet. When we have more songs posted, we could add categories for seasons and festivals and ceremonies and birthdays and so on. Right now, I think we can get by without that, examining this again when we have, say, 1,000 songs posted on Sarkarverse. --[[User:Abhidevananda|Abhidevananda]] ([[User talk:Abhidevananda|talk]]) 16:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
:* ''Namaste'', now we have [[:Category:Songs on PROUT]] and [[:Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory]]. We may need to set a convention for "Books on" "Films on" etc. article. <br/>The article categorization work may be done using replacetool or script or AWB. Let me know if I need to do this. Regards. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Tito Dutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Tito Dutta|Dutta]]</span> 23:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:59, 2 December 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portal:Prabhat Samgiita article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Songs by years
should not be categorize songsof PS by year as we are doing for discourses eg. Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx? )I can not recall whether I have discussed it already). --Tito☸Dutta 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable. Perhaps we could add this to the template. --Abhidevananda (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please suggest exact category name, is Category:Prabhat Samgiita songs given in 19xx okay? I'll start working here very soon. --Tito☸Dutta 09:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Or just "Songs given in 19xx". As far as I know, all of Baba's songs were Prabhat Samgiita. --Abhidevananda (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Mentioning Prabhat Samgiita could be helpful for clarification as it directly gets into our other articles naming conventions. Please check once again, so that I can start work. --Tito☸Dutta 10:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see any advantage in having a category that is "Prabhat Samgiita songs..." rather than just "Songs...", but do whatever you think best. --Abhidevananda (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Please note
I was reading this article Ajker ei shishutaru and I felt, "warning" — the term in the infobox sounds a bit rough. I propose o change it to Warning-->Please note (or something) --Tito☸Dutta 09:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Makes sense. I've changed the text to "Note". Thanks. --Abhidevananda (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Categorization
Namaste,
As we are categorizing song articles, I feel we may use sub-categories as well, like—
- Category:Progressive Utilization Theory (parent category)
- Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory (or something so)
- Category:Books on Progressive Utilization Theory (we have this category)
- Category:Films on Progressive Utilization Theory (something may be needed in future, or "Music albums, events")
Two benefits: a) It'll make the main category less cluttered and b) as a sub-category will be only for these articles, we'll have a clear alphabetical list, with no other article breaking the alphabetical flow. Regards.
This is for other categories like Neohumanism etc. too. --Tito☸Dutta 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, that makes sense. "Songs on PROUT" or "Songs on PROUT" might be simpler than "Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory", but you may set that up whichever way you feel best. Or you could create a redirect for one of the two. For now, I think we only need "Songs on PROUT" and "Songs on neohumanism". The other themes are more generic and probably not requiring categories yet. When we have more songs posted, we could add categories for seasons and festivals and ceremonies and birthdays and so on. Right now, I think we can get by without that, examining this again when we have, say, 1,000 songs posted on Sarkarverse. --Abhidevananda (talk) 16:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Namaste, now we have Category:Songs on PROUT and Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory. We may need to set a convention for "Books on" "Films on" etc. article.
The article categorization work may be done using replacetool or script or AWB. Let me know if I need to do this. Regards. --Tito☸Dutta 23:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Namaste, now we have Category:Songs on PROUT and Category:Songs on Progressive Utilization Theory. We may need to set a convention for "Books on" "Films on" etc. article.