Five Fundamental Principles of PROUT: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Removed Notes section
m (Removed note)
m (Removed Notes section)
Line 169: Line 169:
   
   
It is an undisputed fact that ''Ananda Sutram'' is the commanding authority on all of Sarkar's philosophy. This is stated clearly in Chapter 10: [[Svadhyaya]] of [[Ananda Marga Caryacarya Part 1]].<ref name="AMCC">{{cite book|title=[[Ananda Marga Caryacarya Part 1]]|publisher=[[Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha]]|author=[[Shrii Shrii Anandamurti|Anandamurti, Shrii Shrii]]}}</ref> And though it is well-known and accepted that the relevant Samskrta sutras in ''Ananda Sutram'' do not translate to the words that were tacked onto the end of ''Idea and Ideology'', ''Ananda Sutram'' has never been published with an official English translation of those five aphorisms. As this is not rational, the only possible reason for that singular omission is a concession to the many authors who wrote articles and even books that employed the earlier English wording. Of course, this amounts to the imposition of dogma. But to this day, some older proutists argue feverishly and illogically in favor of that earlier wording.<ref>[http://proutglobe.org/2017/06/the-wording-of-the-five-fundamental-principles-of-prout/ ''The Wording of the Five Fundamental Principles of Prout''] at proutglobe.org</ref>
It is an undisputed fact that ''Ananda Sutram'' is the commanding authority on all of Sarkar's philosophy. This is stated clearly in Chapter 10: [[Svadhyaya]] of [[Ananda Marga Caryacarya Part 1]].<ref name="AMCC">{{cite book|title=[[Ananda Marga Caryacarya Part 1]]|publisher=[[Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha]]|author=[[Shrii Shrii Anandamurti|Anandamurti, Shrii Shrii]]}}</ref> And though it is well-known and accepted that the relevant Samskrta sutras in ''Ananda Sutram'' do not translate to the words that were tacked onto the end of ''Idea and Ideology'', ''Ananda Sutram'' has never been published with an official English translation of those five aphorisms. As this is not rational, the only possible reason for that singular omission is a concession to the many authors who wrote articles and even books that employed the earlier English wording. Of course, this amounts to the imposition of dogma. But to this day, some older proutists argue feverishly and illogically in favor of that earlier wording.<ref>[http://proutglobe.org/2017/06/the-wording-of-the-five-fundamental-principles-of-prout/ ''The Wording of the Five Fundamental Principles of Prout''] at proutglobe.org</ref>
== Notes ==
{{Reflist|group=nb}}


== References ==
== References ==


[[Category:Progressive Utilization Theory]]
[[Category:Progressive Utilization Theory]]

Navigation menu